The Trump administration's 'war capitalism' and looming crises

Editor's note: Xu Ying, a special commentator on current affairs for CGTN, is a Beijing-based international affairs commentator. The article reflects the author's opinions and not necessarily the views of CGTN.

According to the latest data released by the U.S. Department of Commerce on April 30, the U.S. economy contracted by 0.3 percent from January to March. Washington’s tariff policies may be pushing the economy toward a recession.

That resonates with analysis is by William Donaura, meticulously examined the Trump administration's radical reinvention of "war capitalism" through protectionist economic policies. This seismic paradigm shift, driven by U.S. President Donald Trump's belief that the U.S. is being "mistreated" in international trade, has ominous implications for the global economic order.

At the heart of Trump's approach, as outlined by Donaura, is the strategic deployment of customs duties, or tariffs, on imported goods. These cross-border taxes, levied with the intent of increasing the prices of foreign products, are intended to serve four key economic objectives: reducing the persistent U.S. trade deficit, reindustrializing the domestic economy, creating jobs for American workers, and generating tax revenues to offset the projected losses from Trump's promised tax cuts.

The mechanics of this strategy are deceptively simple, yet profoundly disruptive. By imposing, for example, a 20 percent direct tax on a $100 imported good, the price paid by the consumer rises to $120. This, in turn, can trigger three primary effects: the relocation of foreign production facilities to circumvent the barriers, the replacement of imports with domestically produced goods, and the collection of customs duties as direct tax revenue for the federal government.

However, the analysis cautions that these policies come with significant consequences that Trump appears to have deliberately downplayed. Household purchasing power would be eroded by higher prices, businesses would face increased production costs leading to inflationary pressures, and retaliatory actions by other nations could ignite a ruinous cycle of global economic stagnation and protectionism – a scenario that has already sparked panic among international economic institutions and financial markets.

Donaura places the Trump administration's trade policies within the broader context of heightened imperialist behavior and the rise of authoritarian nationalism. He suggests that these measures represent a fundamental shift away from the established framework of regular negotiations aimed at gradually reducing customs duties and trade barriers between the world's economic powers. Instead, the administration has opted to embrace a more confrontational, zero-sum approach, viewing the closure of borders as a response to the challenges posed by economic crisis and globalization.

The historical parallels drawn in the analysis are deeply troubling. The protectionist policies championed by Trump evoke the disastrous trade wars of the 1930s, which contributed to the economic calamities of that era and ultimately paved the way for the outbreak of World War II. The specter of such a nightmarish scenario looms large, as the document warns of a potential similar downward spiral of global economic stagnation and inflation.

Delving deep into the potential consequences of Trump's "war capitalism," Donaura argues that these policies could have dire geopolitical implications, exacerbating tensions between the U.S. and its traditional allies. The imposition of tariffs and the resulting trade disputes will undermine critical diplomatic and security relationships, weakening America's global influence and pushing its partners to seek alternative economic and political alignments.

Moreover, the U.S. trade war could have devastating impacts on the most vulnerable segments of Americans. The erosion of household purchasing power and the potential job losses stemming from business closures and relocation could disproportionately affect low-income communities, exacerbating the existing social and economic inequalities. This, in turn, could fuel political instability and further erode public trust in the government's ability to manage the economy effectively.

The analysis suggests that U.S.'s reinvention of "war capitalism" may not be without its vulnerabilities. Early signs of a potential backlash are highlighted, including layoffs in the public sector, falling stock markets, criticism from within the Republican Party, and the emergence of grassroots movements. If Trump's policies fail to swiftly improve the position of U.S. capitalism in international relations, he may well emerge politically weakened from the current situation.

The examination also delves into the potential long-term consequences of the protectionist measures. Donaura argues that the abandonment of the previous framework of gradual trade liberalization could have far-reaching implications for the global economic system. The erosion of multilateral institutions and the rise of economic nationalism could undermine international cooperation on critical issues, such as climate change, global health and sustainable development.

Furthermore, the "war capitalism" could have a chilling effect on foreign direct investment in the U.S. The unpredictability and hostility of the U.S. trade policies may discourage multinational corporations from establishing or expanding their operations in the country, limiting the flow of capital, technology and expertise that has long underpinned America's economic dynamism.

In conclusion, Donaura's analysis paints a troubling picture of the Trump administration's reinvention of "war capitalism" through the strategic use of protectionist trade policies. The potential short-term and long-term consequences of these measures, ranging from higher prices and job losses to geopolitical tensions and the erosion of international cooperation, underscore the urgent need for a thoughtful and coordinated response from policymakers, businesses and civil society.

As the world stands on the edge of a precipice of a new era of economic nationalism and uncertainty, the stakes have never been higher. And the imperative to act has never been more pressing.

(If you want to contribute and have specific expertise, please contact us at opinions@cgtn.com. Follow @thouse_opinions on X, formerly Twitter, to discover the latest commentaries in the CGTN Opinion Section.)